If they can afford lawyers to send cease-and-desist orders, then
they can afford to work on QC levels and giving a more satisfying
experience to their customers.
I've read the review, and while it wasn't exactly glowing or
anything, it wasn't defamatory, either. Defamatory would be things
like 'There are rats in the kitchen!!!' when there are no rats to
be found, or 'The chef is a bloody #$#$# who deserves to be
shot!!!'.
At the very least I've read far more scathing and bloodthirsty
food reviews than this.
they have no grounds to sue the blogger lah... some ppl think they
got $$ can anyhow sue... if the owner cross the line, the blogger
can sue him/her for causing mental distress or threatening instead
LOL
